Follow us on Twitter

Monday, November 24, 2014

Best European Stock Bets

October Hedge Funds: Best, Worst, Biggest

Jonathan Herbert doesn’t share other investors’ deep anxiety about a recession in Europe.

One
of the region’s best-performing equity hedge fund managers this year,
the Swiss native runs the Camox fund, a value-driven long-short investor
based in London. Herbert’s fund buys lesser-known small- and mid-cap
European stocks that he believes are on the verge of faster earnings
growth because of a product break-through or a turnaround in their
business.

Leading performer Herbert has played a lot of small-cap European shares
to big gains this year while shorting giants Danone and Unilever. Photo: Chris Gloag for Barron’s

“Even
though Europe is mired in anemic growth, it really doesn’t matter
because our companies are innovating and actively selling their products
in China, Latin America, and the Middle East,” says Herbert, 42. “It’s
paradoxical that many of our companies are exhibiting organic growth
rates between 5% and 20%, when gross-domestic-product growth in Europe
is basically at zero.”

Herbert looks for companies that dominate
narrow global industries. Recent investments have included one in the
aluminum auto-engine-parts business and another in enterprise software
made specifically for banks. By his estimates—usually based on a
multiple of enterprise value divided by earnings before interest and
tax—his picks tend to trade at a 40% discount to their large-cap peers,
and their organic growth rate is four times as fast. He’s short a number
of big, household names.

The preference for small-caps has
evolved over time for Herbert, who was raised in the French-speaking
Swiss village of Cologny by an Israeli father and an American mother. He
first became interested in the group while working as a stockbroker at
Deutsche Bank and then at private bank Lombard Odier Darier Hentsch, in
Zurich. He realized risk-averse institutional investors weren’t fully
exploiting the opportunity.

“If you can capture that explosive
growth in terms of investing in the company at the right point in time,
and if the company is cheap enough that you have a margin of safety,
that is where the money is to be made,” says Herbert, who has a joint
master’s degree in economics and business administration from the
University of Lausanne.

His Camox fund (derived from the Latin
word for a breed of mountain goat native to the Swiss Alps) has posted
outstanding returns this year, rising 24.77% through Sept. 30, according
to fund tracker BarclayHedge. That is nearly six times the MSCI World
Index’s meager 4.33% return in the same period. Over three years, Camox
has returned 33.01% annualized, more than double the MSCI’s 16.80%
return.

The gains helped boost assets under management to $255
million (205 million euros) by early October, from just $7.6 million
when Herbert started with a single analyst in February 2008. Camox’s
management fee ranges from 1.5% to 1.7%, plus a performance fee of 17%
to 20%, depending on how long investors agree to lock up their money in
the fund. Minimum investment is $500,000.

“He does not fall in
love with stocks,” says Gilles Lambotte, a partner at Octogone Group, a
financial advisory in Geneva that has invested in Camox. “He gets in and
out with conviction.” In September, when euro-zone inflation fell to
its lowest level in five years, Herbert believed “the market was
slightly overvalued,” so he liquidated 25% of his portfolio. German
stocks fell by 16% in subsequent weeks, so Herbert used the cash he’d
raised to buy stocks.

Camox currently has 25 long positions and six shorts. Among the bullish bets are Software
(ticker: SOW.Germany). Herbert likes enterprise-software stocks because
the companies collect monthly “maintenance charges” from
customers—usually large companies that can’t risk a shutdown. In the
second quarter, Software suffered a surprising decline in sales at its
“middleware” unit, whose products tie together different databases.
Middleware, for instance, is what allows the computer systems of
law-enforcement agencies and airlines to work together to cross-check
passenger lists for terror suspects. The revenue shortfall caused the
stock to fall 33%.

But Herbert’s research found that the company
had lost a senior sales executive and spent a lot of time seeking
certification to work with the U.S. Defense Department, which hurt
European sales. He’s betting sales will rebound. Camox bought shares at
about €18 each, and by mid-November, the stock had risen to €21.50; he
has a target of €40 over two to three years.

Another favorite is Temenos Group
(TEMN.Switzerland) of Geneva, the largest producer of enterprise
software for banks outside of the U.S. As European banks regain their
footing—their solid scores on recent stress tests suggest as much—they
can again afford to upgrade their information-technology systems.
Foreseeing the banking rebound, Camox started buying the stock for about
16 Swiss francs ($16.64) in February 2012, right after it fell sharply.
Since then, Temenos has nearly tripled, recently trading at CHF33.40
($34.55); Herbert expects it to rise above CHF50.

By quizzing
European companies about their suppliers and competitors, Herbert
occasionally discovers companies scarcely covered by sell-side analysts.
One example is Montupet,
(MON.France), a manufacturer of aluminum components for car engines
that suffered in 2009 when General Motors went bankrupt and orders fell.
Herbert bought the stock in September 2013 for €22, anticipating a
recovery in U.S. auto sales and an increase in outsourcing by German car
makers. Backed by rising revenue and profits, the stock has nearly
tripled, to €64. It could top €100 in two or three years, he says.

Among Herbert’s six short positions are large-cap European consumer stocks, including yogurt maker Danone (BN.France), and food and home-products giant Unilever
(ULVR.UK). He thinks the shares of these dividend-paying, slow-growing
companies are overpriced—selling for more than 20 times
earnings—because European investors are scrambling for protection
against a recession.

Shorting large-caps raises cash for Herbert
to invest in smaller gems that are growing a lot faster. “As long as
Europe doesn’t slip into a prolonged recession, our companies will do
just fine—and prosper,” he says.

E-mail: editors@barrons.com





Best European Stock Bets



Tuesday, November 4, 2014

“It’s not personal...it’s strictly business.” Family firms: Business in the blood @TheEconomist



Family firms

Business in the blood

Companies controlled by founding families remain surprisingly important and look set to stay so


| NEW YORK| From the print edition


THE “Lucky Sperm Club”, as Warren Buffett likes to call it, is still
going strong in the commanding heights of business. On opposite sides of
the Atlantic, Ana Botín and Abigail Johnson have recently succeeded
their fathers in filling two of the most powerful jobs in finance, as
chairman of Banco Santander and chief executive of Fidelity Investments,
respectively.

Founding dynasties run, or wield significant clout at, some of the
world’s largest multinationals, from Walmart to Mars, Samsung to BMW.
Half a century ago management experts expected the hereditary principle
to fade fast, because of the greater ability of professionally-run
public firms to raise capital and attract top talent. In fact, family
firms have held their ground and, in recent years have increased their
presence among global businesses.


Family-controlled firms now make up 19% of the companies in the Fortune
Global 500, which tracks the world’s largest firms by sales. That is up
from 15% in 2005, according to new research by McKinsey, a consulting
firm (which defines such firms as ones whose founders or their families
have the biggest stake, of at least 18%, plus the power to appoint the
chief executive). Since 2008 sales by these firms have grown by 7% a
year, slightly ahead of the 6.2% a year by non-family firms in the list.
McKinsey sees these trends continuing for the foreseeable future.



Read the whole article online on The Economist website:  Family firms: Business in the blood | The Economist



Wednesday, October 1, 2014

#Greenspan: If #China were to convert a relatively modest part of its $4 trillion foreign exchange reserves into #gold, the country’s currency could take on unexpected strength in today’s international financial system

In today's world of fiat currencies and floating exchange rates, a return to the gold standard seems to be nowhere on anybody’s horizon. Yet gold still has special properties that no other currency can claim-- which is why China is boosting its holdings..


Golden Rule

Links:
[1] http://www.amazon.com/The-Map-Territory-Nature-Forecasting/dp/1594204810

Read the article on Foreign Affairs here: Golden Rule:





 The Pangea Advisors Blog

#Caribbean Islands continue to offer #Citizenship in return for Investing in #RealEstate @WSJ

Caribbean Exchange: Invest in Property and Get Citizenship - WSJ


Grenada started its citizenship plan to help finance the expansion of its 22-villa Mount Cinnamon resort. Mount Cinnamon Resort

 

With
lending still tight in the Caribbean, several island nations are
embracing an unorthodox method of financing resort and villa projects:
selling citizenship.

The Caribbean vacation-home market has seen
an uneven recovery from the downturn. Sales volumes and prices for
existing homes are rising in larger markets and those with direct
flights to the U.S. But new construction of resorts and for-sale villas
remains hobbled, especially in smaller nations eschewed by most
conventional lenders.

One solution for islands such as St. Kitts,
Nevis, Grenada and Antigua has been to grant citizenship to qualified
investors who agree to spend several hundred thousand dollars buying
home lots or investing in hotel projects there.

The infusions help the islands get tourist destinations constructed. The investors, for their part, receive Caribbean passports.

The
programs are a draw for investors from countries such as China who
often need multiple forms of identification, such as a visa in addition
to their home-country passport, to travel to certain parts of the world.
Obtaining a Caribbean passport allows them to travel visa-free in many
cases.

What's more, some participants can end up paying lower
taxes as Caribbean-nation citizens than as citizens of their home
country, though to get the break they might need to spend a certain
amount of time each year in the Caribbean nation in question.

The
growing popularity of citizenship-by-investment programs underscores the
difficulty of obtaining conventional financing in the Caribbean. Many
smaller nations struggle with fickle tourism demand and limited airline
access, and all must contend with the damage inflicted by tropical
storms. Lenders have been especially leery of the Caribbean in recent
years after several high-profile resort projects ran out of financing
during the downturn and still languish half-built today.

St. Kitts's citizenship-by-investment program has helped the Christophe
Harbour resort sell many of the project's first 100 home sites. Christophe Harbour Development

 

On
St. Kitts, the developers of the 2,500-acre Christophe Harbour resort
community have used the government's citizenship-by-investment program
to sell many of the project's first 100 home sites in the past two years
and to finance construction of a Park Hyatt luxury hotel there.

St.
Kitts sets the minimum property price for investors gaining citizenship
through the program at $400,000. Lot prices at Christophe Harbour range
from $500,000 to $6 million. St. Kitts and sister island Nevis are home
to 55,000 people.

"It isn't easy to find buyers, especially in
the economy we've had" since the downturn, said Thomas Liepman, director
of sales for Christophe Harbour, a joint venture of Kiawah Partners of
Charleston, S.C., and a St. Kitts quasi-government agency. "But
citizenship has driven a recession-proof demand to this tiny island."

Grenada,
an island of 106,000 residents, started its citizenship-by-investment
program last year to help finance the expansion of its 22-villa Mount
Cinnamon Resort and Beach Club. The project's developer, British
hotelier Peter de Savary, aims to build another 80 villas on the site by
soliciting foreigners seeking Grenadian citizenship. He is doing the
same at a mixed-use project elsewhere in Grenada called Port Louis,
which includes a yacht marina, shops and, eventually, villas.

Some
developments are able to sell some lots to Americans who don't want or
need dual citizenship. But Americans alone aren't enough to finance most
projects. Instead, many projects gain most of their investments from
people who routinely encounter travel restrictions and obstacles due to
their country of origin.

"They're marketing to people who are
Russian, Middle Eastern or Chinese," said James Andrews, senior managing
director of Integra Realty Resources Inc., a valuation and consulting
firm specializing in the region's resort and hotel properties. "They get
a [Caribbean] passport, and they don't even have to live there."

St. Kitts sets the minimum property price for investors gaining citizenship through the program at $400,000. Christophe Harbour Development

 

St.
Lucia, Barbados, Bermuda and other islands, fretting that they will
fall behind in tourism development, are studying whether to offer their
own citizenship-by-investment programs.

The Caribbean programs are
similar to those used elsewhere, but provide faster access to
citizenship. In Europe, qualified applicants can gain visas from Spain,
Portugal or Latvia by buying property in those countries. France,
Singapore and the U.S. grant visas to qualified applicants who invest in
companies or projects that create a minimum number of jobs over a set
period.

One big drawback of the programs is the potential for
fraud. Authorities are concerned that without strict oversight, the
programs can be used by money launderers and other criminals for
unfettered travel.

In May, the U.S. Treasury Department sent banks
a warning letter that foreign investors, namely Iranian nationals, were
"abusing" St. Kitts' citizenship-by-investment program for "illicit
financial activity," according to the letters. St. Kitts suspended
Iranians from its program in 2013, but the U.S. alleges Iranians
continue to get St. Kitts passports.

The developers of Christophe Harbour on St. Kitts have teamed with the
government to provide citizenship to qualified applicants who invest at
least $400,000 apiece in the resort community. Christophe Harbour Development

 

In
response, the prime minister of St. Kitts and Nevis has said in public
forums this year that he has instructed his administration to improve
the program's vetting of applicants.

St. Kitts and other Caribbean
nations run the risk that if their vetting of applicants is lax, other
countries will start placing greater restrictions on travelers using
Caribbean nations' passports.

"That could devalue the citizenship
of the issuing country" and undermine its tourism-development program,
said Madeleine Sumption, a research director at Migration Policy
Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank.

Write to Kris Hudson at kris.hudson@wsj.com



Read the article online at the Wall Street Journal: Caribbean Exchange: Invest in Property and Get Citizenship - WSJ

Monday, September 8, 2014

Playing private placements in natural resources recovery @Mineweb

From @SprottGlobal
Rick Rule believes that if you’re able to take part in these transactions, they could be attractive ways to take advantage of a recovery in natural resources, Henry Bonner writes.


Playing private placements in natural resources recovery
Author: Henry Bonner
Posted: Thursday , 04 Sep 2014 

(Sprott Global) - 
Some investors are able to participate in private placements, where a company raises money by offering new shares. For US investors to participate in a private placement, they must be suitably qualified for the offering. Suitability depends on the exemptions under the Securities Act of 1933 through which the company is able to offer new shares. This loosely means that the investor must meet a certain threshold of net worth, income, or investable assets in order to participate.
Private placements may be done by private or publicly trading companies. When a public company issues shares in a private placement, the new shares are not freely tradable, but must be held for a specified period of time, and must have their trading restriction lifted by the issuer’s legal counsel before they can be sold.
Rick Rule believes that if you’re able to take part in these transactions, they could be attractive ways to take advantage of a recovery in natural resources:
Let’s define what a private placement is: a private issuance of new equity, new debt, or new warrants, from the treasury of a public or private issuer. It’s not a secondary market transaction of securities that have already been issued, but rather an issue of new treasuries that isn’t registered as a public offering.
The advantage of private placements to the participant, in a traditional equity private placement, is that you often acquire an amount of stock that would be difficult to buy in the market for a small cap stock. You get to acquire the stock on terms that are set with the issuer, and not set by the vagaries of the bid and ask in the market. You may also be able to acuqire a warrant or a half-warrant along with your shares. A warrant is the right but not the obligation to buy more shares at a fixed price. It’s this leverage in the warrant that has made Sprott Global an active participant in private placement markets for 30 years.
Increasingly, other forms of private placements have become interesting to the people who run Sprott, myself included. We have found that, particularly in the United States, the costs of running a public company are so extraordinary that for ventures requiring less than $50 million in capital, we are better off funding private companies who avoid many of these costs.
So, increasingly, at Sprott, we are investing by way of private equity transactions, or we’re doing business in unincorporated joint ventures or partnerships. That’s particularly true where our goal is income. We find that the public 'wrapper' -- with the ongoing expense of a public listing, including legal, audit, and Sarbanes-Oxley fees -- is inefficient and reduces the amount of income that can be distributed by the company to the investor.
So one of the things that Sprott customers will be seeing with increased frequency in the next 5 years, particularly with regards to income-generating transactions, will be privately placed debt instruments from public issuers, oil and gas income opportunities, and infrastructure income from opportunities like terminals and pipelines. Theses are not publicly-trading equities, but rather, they are either shares in limited liability companies or in limited partnerships designed to funnel money directly to investors and that are exempt from filing fees, Sarbanes-Oxley, and registration statements.
Readers should know that in order to participate in placements generally, they need to have a certain level of assets based upon the type of exemption the offering utilizes. Often, investors need to have $1 million in investable assets; in some cases, the investor must be a Qualified Purchaser, meaning they have $5 million in investable assets. It will be important for investors to understand, when analyzing private placements for their own portfolios, which of these classifications they are in. That’s of course a function of their investable capital.



Playing private placements in natural resources recovery - GOLD NEWS - Mineweb.com Mineweb





The Pangea Advisors Blog