Follow us on Twitter

Monday, May 20, 2019

Wednesday, May 15, 2019

Active vs. Passive Investing? #CapitalGroup Takes on #Vanguard - Bloomberg

Capital Group's founder JBL's "somewhat heretical view at the time was you should actually know something about the companies in which you're investing," Rob Lovelace says. "It was always based on research. This was our comparative advantage. This is in our DNA."

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2019-05-14/the-1-9-trillion-fund-giant-with-a-crazy-idea-about-investing

bit.ly/PangeaBlog
bit.ly/PangeaFeeds

Saturday, May 4, 2019

#Vanguard Patented a Method to Avoid #Taxes on #MutualFunds

Wow! Pretty crazy! And brilliant I might add, although as Gabelli points out: "You're going against the intent of the system and finding ways to manipulate it," Gabelli said. "It's not good for confidence in the capital markets, and shame on Vanguard for doing it."

From Bloomberg: 

Vanguard Patented a Way to Avoid Taxes on Mutual Funds

By Zachary R. Mider, Annie Massa and Christopher Cannon May 1, 2019

Like flipping a light switch, Vanguard Group Inc. has figured out a way to shut off taxes in its mutual funds.
The first to benefit was the Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund. Investors' end-of-year tax forms abruptly stopped showing capital gains in 2001, even as the fund went on to generate billions of dollars of them. By 2011, Vanguard had flipped the switch in 14 stock funds. In all, these funds have booked $191 billion in gains while reporting zero to the Internal Revenue Service.
This astounding success gives Vanguard funds an edge over competitors. Yet the world's second-largest asset manager has avoided drawing attention to it. Top executives at the Malvern, Pennsylvania-based firm don't want U.S. policymakers looking too closely at how they're doing it, according to a former insider.
But a review of financial statements and trading data shows that Vanguard relies substantially on so-called heartbeat trades, which wash away taxes by rapidly pumping stocks in and out of a fund. These controversial transactions are common in exchange-traded funds—a record $98 billion of them took place last year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg News—but only Vanguard has used them routinely to also benefit mutual funds.
Here's how it works: Vanguard attaches a more tax-efficient ETF to an existing mutual fund. Then the ETF siphons appreciated stocks out of the mutual fund without incurring taxes, often using heartbeat trades. Robert Gordon, who has written about the concept and is president of Twenty-First Securities Corp. in New York, calls it a tax "dialysis machine."

How to Spot a Heartbeat
Rapidly pumping money into and out of the exchange-traded portion of the Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund removes taxable gains for the benefit of the mutual fund's shareholders.




Beginning in 2017, outflows stretched over five days.

Vanguard even got a patent on the design, valid until 2023, so competitors can't copy it.


Thursday, March 28, 2019

Interested in doing an #ICO/#STO? You can buy the “kit” for $60k on eBay

From FT Alphaville's Jemima Kelly:
The core business model would run just as well in the centralised world without any tokens or crypto or blockchain... They can easily eliminate the crypto functionality out of this. The core component is a platform — it doesn't require any crypto or blockchain component to work. Just a typical, centralised server. 
Again Komar — without necessarily realising it — had managed to rather nicely encapsulate the speciousness and incoherence of the ICO bubble. All Sponsy requires to function is a "typical, centralised server", and yet its tagline is: "Decentralised Sponsorship Platform". 
The eBay listing also contained some other potentially attractive promises to prospective buyers, such as: 
Full set of investment documents
Designed and approved by investment bankers.
Aside from the fact that it seemed a little odd to be selling any kind of preapproved investment documents, this seemed good! Which investment bank had approved the project, we wanted to know? At that point Komar, who is Belarusian but seemed to speak perfectly decent English, appeared to get in a bit of a twist:
"Approved" might be a huge word for it. It might be some kind of exaggeration. We did have a law firm based in the UK that ran some sort of audit of our project, and it ranked it, and the rank that we got was pretty high and the risk we got was pretty low. This was an audit by a British firm. This couldn't be called a fully fledged investment banking audit, it's just some firm that was considering investing in crypto. 

https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2019/03/25/1553498702000/A-failed-ICO-is-trying-to-flog-itself-on-eBay-/


Tuesday, March 26, 2019

#LME joins @Mercuria-led #Blockchain-based Global #Metals Tracking Consortium #Forcefield

"World's largest metals trading venue has supported the group led by Swiss trader Mercuria, which would provide a better picture of the flow of metals around the world. Dubbed "Forcefield", also includes banks such as Macquarie and ING.

"While the LME closely tracks metal such as copper, zinc and aluminium that sits in its global network of warehouses, a far larger amount of metal is traded and stored outside of the exchange. In addition the LME has no approved warehouses in China, the world's largest consumer of metals


Blockchain's distributed ledger technology would reduce the need to have one central owner of the database, who would have too much private information to make it viable ... In a blockchain-based system "you know where your metal is, you have proof of your metal, but nobody can see what your metal is and where your metal is,"

Read the article on the Financial Times